>>4169815Your "central point" is that you can add shit to it to make it ergonomically friendly.
>oh look my camera is usable now that I added a body outside of its body and a wireless shutter release to be able to control it inside the new body!>Look at the cameras everyone uses. Do you see a deep grip on this? No. Is it the size of a 5d? No. It is as small and light as possible so it is easy to take with you and manuever into position.As I was saying, if ergos don't matter then you might as well cut the chase and use a phone. Turns out one of the reasons to use a dedicated camera is that phone ergonomics SUCK ASS.
>This camera right here sells more than the entire "real camera" industry combined. That's a phone with a camera in it. You're basically saying 'oh look, this Swiss army knife sellls more than the entire "real orange peeler' industry combined'. Well, no shit sherlock. You're making a dishonest argument and you know it.
>People do not want the equivalent of a split keyboard with wrist rests. You don't need THAT kind of "ergonomics" unless you are literally crippled.I don't think people want the shitty Lenovo chiclet keyboards either, which would be the Sony equivalent. I'm not shilling for cameras with integrated vertical grip here, I'm arguing for cameras with a functional horizontal grip.
