>>3748074>Deliberately misrepresents and cherry picks this hard>Thinks ISO1600 is somehow gonna be bad because this chart says that an APSC camera as 1/4 of a stop more DR at the ISO difference>Imagine spec sheeting this hard and getting it so fucking wrongLet me play your bullshit specsheet warrior game for a second. You might be in a situation a few stops darker than cloudy/overcast at f/2.8 and you want 1/400th, and that may lead you to use ISO400. At f/4 that'll be ISO800. Also lets compare a camera with a similar resolution, not one with a very high pixel count in a different class.
Ohnononono, whats this? There is actually -more- DR on the FF camera at higher ISO?