>>4207371>800 may be just fine for you needs, you could also look into getting a tripod.I expose for JPEGS, not RAWs, I like getting results straight out of camera and doing whatever edits I need straight on it
Otherwise sure I could have shot
>>4207291 at something like ISO 800 to get a higher shutter speed but or narrower aperture, but there's not much of a reason to go that way
DoF could be even thinner, and with a 40mm lens I can shoot handheld down to 1/15th comfortably
No reason to add more steps to the workflow for my use!
Higher ISOs are a lot of fun, people shouldn't be afraid to use 'em
You gotta knock down any noise reduction though (choosing the level of reduction and clarity is a nice feature of fuji cameras)
