>>4098279you can always choose just one line in the song and make an entire story based on that without context. it works better than u would expect.
>>4098315good question anon.
first of all, they need a reason to not be writing a book. otherwise they would write a fucking book.
so obviously they start with the visuals.
in most cases afaik they don't often turn out to be photographers, but more like guys who watch a lot of movies and "photograph" their favorite scenes of those movies.
>budgetif they had infinite budget, there would be no development of style at all.
style in a practical view is determined by what you spend your resources on.
your resources are:
>money/timewhich then buy:
>your audio>your screenwhich combine to buy
>the audience's attention (time)audio and screen space are limited (budgeted) by how large the frames can be.
so style is determined mostly by what the artist puts into these spaces.
things like "context" and "writing" don't qualify as resources, since there can be nearly infinite context in the mind of the viewer (imagine writing a scene about someone very famous like Donald Trump) and writing is kind of downstream from everything else.
so the first step for any director is to get a handle on his idea, compare it to his budget, and then see what he can do.
if he can't do it, he doesn't try. he just finds another project that he's inspired to make and that fits within his limitations.
that's being creative.
there's nothing creative about "I have an idea and I need $100000000 or i can never do anything", well then he's not a creative person, he's a guy with one fucking idea.
the budget separates the people with more inspiration from the people with less inspiration, aka creative people from uncreative people.
