>>3674025>I do think even if you think you want to use primes, you should at least get a 17-50/18-55ish zoom just to practice with.gotcha, Im just prejudiced towards zooms since Ive used it on a crossover and it sucked so much, but yes, starting with a prime doesnt sound wise.
>BTW, 17-55 is not telescope, it just means it varies from 17mm to 55mm.I was thinking mostly about 80-200 ranges, for now it seems too much work for something that doesnt interest me that much. Also, Im thinking about the size of the camera, if I stick a huge lens on it no matter how good, camera just become too noticable, even a big DSLR with a small lengh lens can fit in civilian population which is why I think of primes (?).
