>>3061441Stop telling people this bullshit in every thread where it's mentioned, why are you trying to get people to spend more money when it's not necessary? Pic related is a 100% crop, no sharpening, scanned with a 50mm + extention tube on apsc. Now if you want to tell me this "won't cut it" or is "unusable" or some other bullshit along those lines, then you're wrong and a fucking retard.
>>3061336The more time and effort you put into the scanning setup, the better results you will get. I place the film on a light table with some glass on top to keep the film flat, then set the camera on a tripod and manual focus on the grain. Find out with aperture your lens is sharpest at and use that (probably f8 - f11), you can even stitch together photos to get better results.
