>>4095290>Anonymous 11/01/22(Tue)18:45:55 No.4095290▶> >>4094543> dude are you dumb? did you ever use a dual camera mount for a tripod or for a camera stand? of course the composition is slightly off... one camera mount is like 20 cm to the left and one camera mount is 20cm to the right of the center of the tripod. when you mount 2 cameras on the the dual mount, they will each be like 40cm apart. you can only do the same exact composition if you shoot handheld or with a single camera but then you have to change lenses and that takes time... meaning, in those 10 seconds that you took to switch the camera, the lighting can change completely.> and if youre talking about >>4092436 this post, its obviously the same images except cropped in, he obviously cropped it in to show us exact differences in rendering, hence the pointed out colored circles to show you the difference in rendering, which OBVIOUSLY the top image renders with more contrast and more 3D like way, compared to the bottom image that not only lacks detail in literally everything except the berries but also lacks that 3D rendering, plus he said he also edited the bottom image to look as 3d like as possible and its still lacking detail and 3d. AKA. its literally nikon sooc vs a fully edited sigma image and the sooc nikon still looks better. makes you wonder just how much shittier the sigma image looks sooc lmfao> >>4094606> >this is why art is subjective> >the colors look much more pleasing to my eye> colors are not important and are not the point of this discussion but yeah, even the colors on the SOOC nikon look better than those on the edited sigma imageI seriously hope this is copypasta and you didn't write that screeching tirade about muh FREE DEE RENDURRING fresh.
