Guy from examples here again.
>>2985796>Don't take this as an insult, but have you ever actually physically picked up and looked through a professional photo book? Or any commercial printed photography?See pic related. I don't know if this kind of stuff isn't common in some places, though.
But I understand the general concern. I studied design, but I'm a photographer above all. Very often a designer's idea isn't aligned with a photog's wish...
>>2985799That definitely doesn't look "huge" for me, for instance. But I guess taste plays some role in these matters...
>>2985834>I would suggest omitting names entirelyThis actually seems a good idea to me. I agree with
>>2985945 in this regard.
That all being said, well, I'm actually stepping back from my suggestion. It's obviously not very popular, and the book is for /p/ after all. You guys have to like it...
Good luck, Iggy; hope the examples weren't totally unworthy, anyway.
