>>3724125Anyways continuing
---
>>3718177Lovely buildings, pretty good. Nice colours too
If you really want critique, the building in the dark (third row) feels off compared to your whole feed. Its the only image with which dark/light contrasts. Image itself is not bad though
>>3718862Chaotic feed (like many), but I like the lighting on some. The bottom-right one has nice shapes too.
>>3719008Excellent use of B&W. Love
>>3722309First off all, critque others...
Second, there are some good pictures in there. But Personally I don't like the film borders, they don't add anything to most of the pictures and distract me from the subject. (Also they look really try-hard with them)
The portrait most right on the 5th row looks nice though, the blue tint from the glass works well with your subject
>>3722382>Not critiquing others>Not even posting a screenshot of your feedJust pay for followers if that's the only thing you care about. You're not gonna get them here this way
---
My IG:
https://www.instagram.com/smiba11/Haven't been able to take pictures lately due to C-19 and other life occupations. Have a few rolls of E6 ready to develop though (Hope to post them in a few weeks if I don't mess up)
Feel free to critique or be honest with me. I like compliments but if there are things I can improve I'd love to hear it too