>>3887604fuck me this is good
>>3887548all the consoomer films are good at different things, but i like Fuji C200. Pro Image is a little less contrasty and has a more balanced palette, Ultramax has big grain and super intense blues, but C200 has more moderate grain and those slightly-turquoise Fuji greens. it's also over a buck cheaper per roll than Pro Image (if you can find it for MSRP). those UW+S pics i uploaded yesterday used it, so did picrel
i basically like C200 more than Pro Image because it's worse. lmao. the highlights block up under overexposure, the shadows get that infamous green tint if you underexpose, and the colors shift unevenly under high color temps (greens get even more turquoise but blues don't get bluer). it's imperfect but unique, where Pro Image is like if someone said "give me Portra, but less so"
Superia 400 has the same technical limitations, but exaggerated: green tint in shadows, magenta tint in highlights, big grain, blown highlights. amazing greens though
>>3887656well are you gonna show us?
