>>retards, too many to quoteHoly fucking essay. Many words no thoughts. I just told
>>4197295 to buy a Z5 because it has more autofocus adapters available than canon and is the same price as the RP but has IBIS and a modern sensor. What's the point of EF-RF having slightly faster autofocus if the first camera in the system with all the standard equipment is a new (dated) $2000 R6 1 and the Z5 is $999 new, and someone is talking about buying cheap cameras. Between those a brand new Z6 II is $1600, and used cameras get even cheaper - ie: used A7RIII is a good value for the money and a patient man could get an undamaged one for close to $1200. Used R6 1s are $1600+ for reference.
And remember, no matter how bad your autofocus is, it's not as bad a pentax K1.
>buy le systemDumb idea. Not everyone who buys a $$$ amateur camera is going to go to a 2$$$-3$$$ professional camera later even if canon cripples their cheap stuff so hard with missing features and ancient sensors that even an amateur would really want to.
>dpreview stuffIDC they are clearly fucking with something unspoken or ACR really is that bad. Don't trust those retarded test shots ever. They don't even translate that well to real subjects. Really why do people use and trust that page?
>le crob sensor xdddddd le brands le merrless xdddd evf gonsbiracy :DDDDDDumbest shit ever. Who fucking cares you can use wide angles as the field of view they actually are with a 35mm sensor and just crop if you want to crop. Its not worth debating theoretical "BUT IF" IQ differences because you dont post relevant examples of your work and are probably just making shit up talking about cameras you dont own. No one cares about your unproven specs theories and literal wank.
Now look, a picture, amazing, bet you don't take many of those bud. Imagine being a nophoto gearfag, instead of a hasphoto gearfag. Kek.
