>>3969648...
i regard the optics of late models all in same regard; zeiss sure has a more glorious name behind it; but often i compared mamiya 80mm f2.8 to the distagon i had in hasselblad, and the former would look sharper (it was newer, more well cared for, but mostly newer);
tlr
most rollei and yashicas are very old by now; you will find newer rolleis, sometimes even t* coated etc, but prices vary too much; along the age it comes a lot of quirks: idiosyncratic mechanisms, dark ground glasses, etc; but it call be fixed easily
tlr provide a very nice user experience in mf, since they mirrors, thus wlf, which are great for working on framing and composition etc; but the mirrors are not moving, so they're light, and shake as much as 35m rangefinder camera, ie none;
newer rollei are worth the price if you can afford and you like wlf; just like many people don't enjoy using rf, wlf are a thing of its on for those accustomed to eye level usage
rf
i had very little contact with these, since i never got used to it; on paper, these are the very sharpest lenses you will find for mf cameras
fuji ones are nice, i would to be comfortable using an fuji gw670 bc the negs ir produces are amazingly sharp but i cannot find myself using rf
pic related i shot with rz67 + 65mm f4 on old ektachrome; scanned in a flatbed
