>>3832491That's fine and all, but in the events that you would go for clients then this thread is possibly helpful. Feel free to stick around.
>>3832493Well that's the purpose of this thread. For discussion about opposing such things and how we can manage in such harsh industry conditions. I hate to break it to you but the actual paying clients for most photography are on the conservative side. Influences expect YOU to pay them to take photos of them, which is really all you need to know about those types of people. They expect you to pay for the privilege of their existence.
>>3832494>Just leaveYou're unwanted here. It seems the purpose of reaction images are lost on you. I'm not seething. You're the one in my thread trying your damnedest to be contrarian. Probably the same person who endlessly cries about Fujifilm users.
