>>4001819>is the image quality from nikon that superior from that that i would get from fuji?Yes. Pic related.
>>4001824>>4001877>fuji takes better>biggest difference>it wouldn't be that much of a differenceThis is ISO 200. It gets worse as you go to higher ISOs. There is no point comparing the IQ of the sensors or lenses in this scenario. The D800E+Sigma curb stomps this Fuji.
>>40019321,000x this. The Fuji is fine for what it is. The VF, the film sims, the styling, the fixed lens...it's supposed to give you that small, fast, film rangefinder experience. If you want to shoot urban street without making people think you're a stalker, it has it all over the D800E. But it's not a replacement for a D800E. It's not a main camera.
That said, if you're not stuck on the styling/VF/film sims/"experience" of the X100f, there are better, cheaper options for compact P&S replacements. A used EOS M5 + 22mm f/2 will deliver sharper results and you can change the lens. But I won't knock someone for wanting said "experience". The VF alone can be very valuable.
