>>3508575Did some googling and 3M bought out Ferrania in 1964 so I'm geussing is 3M branded Ferrania film and granted that Ferrania hasn't produced film in a long time and how that cancister looks I'd say it's form the 80s or maybe late 70s. Which if so it wouldn't be e6 processed film and since it's old as fuck would produce very bad results.
>>35085795 bucks isn't too bad for e200 but I wouldn't expect perfect results from old film. Azriel Knight made a great video on how to shoot/develop expired e6 films give it a watch.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2DQPPujGloM&t=296s>>3508752Plustek 8100 is the best bang for buck 35mm scanner ez. If you shoot a lot of colour I'd reccomend getting the 8200i which is the same scanner but has an infrared dust removal option (doesn't work with black and white film). Don't bother with flatbeds they have terrible image quality for 35mm and take up a lot of room but if you shoot 120 flatbeds are your only bang for buck option.
>>3508978that's neat what's wrong with it?
>>3508981>What slide film has biggest exposure latitude?They all have around the same latitude of +/- 0.5-1 f/ stop so get whatever is cheapest (probably Provia 100F). I'd suggest getting an external lightmeter or downloading a lightmeter app on your phone (they all work just as good as each other)
