>>4392099I was looking directly at the slide with a good quality loupe and was genuinely impressed by the image quality
not to be a pixelpeeping faggot (or grainpeeping faggot in this case), but look at the scan
>>4392099, which is already great, and look at picrel
the image is shit because my phone's camera is shit, but you can clearly see what time is it in the tower clock when looking at the positive with a loupe
my scans are all high quality, and I knew it still couldn't reach the level of detail we see on film, but I thought the difference was minimal
I've recently bought a good loupe for LF focusing, and just got my 6x7 positives back and holy fucking shit
Been shooting film for almost 10 years and never seen positives under magnification, it's absurd
