>>4101920>Okay I don't care. You're not even capable of independent thought. No fucking wonder you don't take photos.We're talking DEFINITIONS here mate, you're only mad because the word "art" doesn't mean what you think it does.
>Art is a construct of beauty. Not "cute puppies" beauty but all forms of beauty, from terrible beauty to cute puppies to sexy women. Art is something you perceive. It is a thing in real space and real time that evokes emotions related to awe and wonder that the mundane things around it do not. It does not have or need a creator or a history, although a creator and a history can be part of the presentation. A lot of those things you called art - well, they're not art. People made them but they are ugly, they're not art, they're junk. If they are intended to be art then they are best salvaged as comedy, or parts of a whole that is art.>junk art isn't artlol, someone call Picasso to tell him he wasn't an artist
>It is self evident. I have derived this definition from my experiences in reality. This definition is the thing I have found all works of art manmade, purposeful, accidental, and natural, to share, and when people have different experiences and preferences than me, when I examine them I find this holds true. They may not like the same things but art is something out of the mundane that evokes more, no matter how it came into being.So I should trust "your experience" over a dictionary to define words, lmao.
>>4101921He wouldn't have gone through all those cancer or not, he was spraying like his life depended on it.
