>(PART 2)Did I opt in to a difficult style of photography? Seems harder than street photography. If anything I think a forest has interesting things, but at a microscopic level. Should I have better opted in to macroscope photography?
I checked out some forest photographer youtubers, but when I look at their pictures I feel nothing, it doesnt look interesting. They sound professional but their pics don't seem to stand out. Only thing impressive is the quality of their images (better gear)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TvrvVRjtAD0https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ik6-hmQ_qQI --> (Here he shows interesting soulful pics starting at 12:57)
Could it also be that I just need to MAKE my pictures better by using post processing? I actually wanted to learn the craft first before doing post processing stuff.
I'll post 11 pics I took on my hikes, which I found to be interesting. Pls tell me how to make them better.
>(pic related is the original underexposed. Could you show me a version with better post processing than I did in my first post) 