>>4076399>It's just a butthurt kid that can't afford anything but the $80 kit lens and body mft setup he found on Craigslist.kek moop, point me to that setup because it unironically sounds like a great way to get into MFT. I shoot fool frame.
>Smaller sensors are objectively worse for low light performance, unquestionably, question the motives of anyone trying to tell you otherwise.The difference is negligible. A flash is a MUCH better solution, poorly lit photos always look like shit. Controlling the lighting is part of what makes photography an art.
>>4076445>What exactly does 2 more stops of performance mean? Remember that I am new to photography.It means that you could handhold the lens twice as long, or use a lens at twice the f-number and get no camera shake from doing it. This helps you go easier on the ISO. Still, the biggest performance increase you could get is using proper lighting. This means use a flash. And for fuck's sake, bounce it.
