>>3399868How was the NES compared to the N64?
EXACTLY the same thing, RIGHT? technological progress literally had zero effect on gaming, RIGHT?!
>>3399867>all of those problemsYEAH, HOW DARE A FIRST GENERATION, POORBOY BUDGET DEVICE NOT BE PERFECT!
> Fucking took them long enough.YEAH, 5 YEARS FOR A BRAND NEW PRODUCT LINE AND NEW PRODUCT CATEGORY IS FAR TOO LONG TO IRON OUT EVERY TINY, SUBJECTIVE PROBLEM I CAN FIND!
>you’re thinking of some other anon. Oh, that OTHER anon with a faulty prox sensor on his a7ii that never shuts up about it? On a board with maybe 50 regulars, tops.
Fuck me pal, you're too dumb to use Sony, I'm glad you don't get along with them.
>think of it as “multiple poor design decisions which lead to a slow and frustrating experience when trying to shoot from anything below eye level”.I have no idea what the fuck you are talking about, pic related. camera pressed so it's almost squeezing against my body, if i bring it any closer so it swaps i'll start to block off the screen with my own body. Same camera as yours.
I can only deduce, you're trying to invent problems that don't exist to justify you being a shit tog.
