>>3552302Yeah it is a cool lens comparison. That's what DP review are really good at. This particular example as posted in
>>3552296 is testing the mediocre Sony 85mm f/1.4 G Master lens that retails for $1800 against the absolutely top of the line, exquisitely performing Olympus 45mm f1.8 that retails for $230.
As you can see, the $230 Olympus lens just blows the $1800 Sony lens completely out of the water. It's no comparison even. This is why I always use DP review to show how inferior Sony is, because DP review is always very careful to use the absolute top tier Sony lenses against the lowest tier Micro Four Thirds lenses, to show how absolutely inferior Sony lenses are. A lot of people think this makes DP review vastly biased against Olympus for using their cheapest entry level lenses against Sony's top of the line most expensive lenses, but they're so stupid, it's actually is biased against Sony, because they have to compete with the fact that a $230 Micro Four Thirds lens so vastly outperforms them that the only differentiating factor is the resolution of the Sony is twice as many pixels!
Man, people are so gullible to think DP review are just a biased paid shill operation! XDDD
