>>4097938Is photoshop a cope for bad photography?
Have you ever taken photos of a bird like this? Do you realize how high the ISO needs to be to get a good image? There’s nothing bad about this photo at all. The noise is a by product of camera settings required to capture this. So should it be left in the final image so the photographer doesn’t have to be worried about internet bullies on /p/ (who only go around taking snapshits of fire hydrants) saying he’s coping?
Or are you saying the photographer should be morally obligated to buy a far more expensive camera for a slight reduction of noise because— I suppose— using a denoise slider is less of a “cope” than a Denoise program?
If you didn’t know the photographer used a denoise program and only saw the final image would harangue them on suspicion of… post processing their image?
I really hate this board
