>>3534842>uneducated opinions fueled by buyer's remorse.I had buyer's remorse almost immediately after I got my A7r ii and had to start buying lenses for it. I have absolutely ZERO buyers remorse for selling it and my Nikon gear and upgrading to MFT. The 300mm f/4, 40-150 f/2.8, and the 1.4x and 2x TCs made the switch worth it all by themselves. Those two lenses and 2 TCs alone allow me to do more and produce nearly equivalent results than when I shot FF, at a mere fraction of the price.
I can have the entire range from 80-600mm equiv, plus 840mm and 1600mm equiv fields of view with a, entire kit that fits in an Amazon Basics regular size DSLR bag and weighs less than a single body and 600mm lens on FF.
And that's just getting started on the litany of MAJOR advantages the MFT system has. Literally the ONLY things FF have going for it are marginally better performance in low light, higher resolution for printing larger than poster size. and bokehwhoring.
I'm not a bokehwhore because I actually have talent. I'm not printing larger than poster size because clients never ask for it (and if they did I'd just rent a 50S). I don't shoot in the fucking dark for professional work, and what low light I do have to shoot in (historic chapels that don't allow speedlights, for example), MFT is more than adequate.
Please, do tell, where's the buyer's remorse?
>your lack of understanding of physics and optics Pic related.
