>>2948451>Admits his photos dont have have any creative merit but decides to post them anyway>Gets butthurt when people call his shitty tracphone photos shittyNot the guy you're replying to but good lord kid, get your head out of your ass and understand that you took some crap photos and move on, you're not going to convince anybody here that they have some deep aesthetic only you can understand.
Not to mention the photo you pointed out as an example of good composition has absolutely terrible composition, your eye sees the white space in the middle and wants to travel upwards towards the opening but there's nothing so you explore the image only to see blurry leaves and white coming out of the side that ruins the framing you believed this photo had and all your left with is a tiny blurry car at the bottom.
90% of the photo is visual clutter with nothing to look at with the remaining 10% just being a car under some leaves. It's shit.
If you want to be taken seriously please understand big words like "composition" before you use them and get a cheap second-hand rebel so your photos dont look like you smudged up your lens with a glue stick before you took them.
You can be a baby and defend your "work" till the end of days but all you'll be doing is convincing yourself that everybody's just a meanie poopoo face and you'll never improve or grow as a person or artist.
I could go on but I'm not shitting up this thread any further, you have a choice to make and I hope you know which is the right one.
