>>3065921>but your examples suck balls.Also, it's worth pointing out that good scanning also reveals the quality, or lack thereof, of the source material. I can publish what might be an unusable negative scanned another way, just because I can still get something out of it.
But also, if you use low quality lenses or poor technique, then that will show up in the scan too, as softness or blur. And given that I enjoy the use of meme lenses, and that I usually only shoot colour in full-auto compacts, and only want to post rejects to /p/ for the most part, it makes it hard for me to share "high technical quality" colour photos to prove my DSLRcuck superiority.
But for this shot I used a normal sharp film, and even though it was my meme crop sensor 30/1.4 Art, I stopped down for this shot, giving reasonable res across the frame. And it's a rank snapshit, on reflection.
So here you go.
