>>3931854>Google says I'm wrong, Wikipedia says I'm wrong, but based off absolutely zero evidence I think I'm right and you don't know what you're talking about! >:(How about the Fuji Xpro brochure which even says the "digital split image is reminiscent of old rangefinders", what do you think of Fuji implicitly communicating it's not a real rangefinder like this, and is in fact pure larp?