>>3379663Thanks for posting this one. This is the more interesting one of the two because it has a source which I was able to investigate.
In this case, the source is from here:
https://qz.com/1355874/terrorism-is-surging-in-the-us-fueled-by-right-wing-extremists/You should read this:
>Out of 65 incidents, 37 were tied to racist, anti-Muslim, homophobic, anti-Semitic, fascist, anti-government, or xenophobic motivations.So every attack against the Trump government is being classified as right wing extremism. I think you can agree this is a massive flaw.
Let me demonstrate.
Example:
https://www.start.umd.edu/gtd/search/IncidentSummary.aspx?gtdid=201706210022Classified as anti-government, and credited as a right wing terrorist.
This is obviously an error, the perpetrator is muslim, and we have his confessions in the court documents.
This was islamic terrorism:
https://heavy.com/news/2017/06/amor-ftouhi-flint-airport-suspect-photo-isis-terrorism-terror-allahu-akbar-stabbing/Second concern:
That article is based on this particular database:
https://www.start.umd.edu/gtd/search/Results.aspx?country=217Which has no entries at the beginning of November 2017 that relates to this attack:
https://www.christianitytoday.com/news/2017/november/mass-shooting-sutherland-springs-first-baptist-church-texas.htmlThat was committed by one of our atheist friends who got butthurt over the internet and decided to take his rage out on some children at a church.
So your entire argument is relying on converting islamic terrorists and anti-government terrorists into accusations against the right.
And ignoring the crimes of leftist Atheist communities.
Your data can be discarded, it's useless.
