>>3983887LOL I came to see what's up here for first time in years. This style was common back in the day. I know I didn't really give critique, just my quick opinions. A photog shouldn't feel discouraged if a anonymous nobody didn't like their picture. I mean that's what this is; a few words some asshole nobody typed on their phone.
Just keep shooting and doing what you like. If you show your photos people are going to have opinions on them and only some of the people tell you what their opinion really is. I always thought harsh critique was the one thing this place was good for. Someone says my photo is shit so I look at my photo and think about it. Is the person full of shit or is the photo shit? I know people in real life are full of shit when they say my photos are great.
Anyway. Here's a photo I took a couple of days ago for
>>3983849 to chew on. Go on, I'm throwing you a bone here :)
