Commented on a few that caught my eye in one way or another. Mostly portraits.
>>3346714Crop in tighter. Not a fan of the saturation or color grading, but that's just personal taste.
>>3346735This is cool, but it feels like a color picture edited into monochrome rather than something that was composed and shot for black and white film. The contrast is just all in the wrong places.
>>3347020Again, the contrast here is just off. Why are her stockings framed against the dark drawers? Conversely, her arm and back and the mirror all just blend in to each other.
The lighting on her face (and all over) is just dull. Her expression is boring and ugly.
>>3347745Love the colors. Compositionally not too interesting. Model is hot but pose also isn't interesting. Slightly soft focus isn't as big a deal as internet nerds make it out to be, but the fact that this isn't just evenly soft, but focused squarely on her vagina is a big distracting.
>>3347774This is really great. Love the repetition of forms and colors inside the rectangular frame. Just really nice to look at.
>>3348433I can imagine taking this and thinking at the time "this is gonna be hella dope", then getting home and realizing it's pretty bland.
>>3350272This is interesting, but something is missing. It's pretty clear what you're going for, but I think the geometry isn't enough to overcome the otherwise bland subject. I feel like there might be a tighter crop that would work better here.
>>3351871>>3351874Center face in frame. Click shutter. Apply filter.
I don't see any thought put into the composition. None of the elements in the frame work together.
>>3355453There's no way you shot this and thought, wow, that's a good one. That really captures his essence.
