>>3770702It looks like you are looking for more specific things.
>Good colors but the pic can't be saved just by them, there's no subject and it's not abstract enough. 3/10>Same as the previous one. 2/10Yeah, I guess these could work in places where you just need some visual noise, like a wallpaper or sth. I posted it just because I was happy with the colors, and it's nice that you think the same. I do like the windows more though.
>Nice colours , no subject once again. 5/10Most people I showed this to found a clear focus point on the center illuminated tree due to the rays coming out of it. So I guess it's all about what you treat as a valid subject. The fog looked spectacular in person though, I wish I could've done it better.
>This is REALLY good, compliments. 8/10thanks, I'll post another one from that set, regardless of whether it's good or not, better post a mediocre photo than nophoto at all.
>This could blind someone, I know that the point was to give the Saint's statue a bright area, but this is too much. Pic is ok. 5/10I liked it, but couldn't tell you why. I wanted to give the Jesus a solid background, maybe black would be more interesting?
>You either shot the bird or the girl, crop the Pic cause the only element on focus is in a really narrow spot. 4/10I have nany pictures of this girl and her parrots, I have a lot of trouble shooting people. Most of those pics suffered from a very shallow DoF. Maybe I could post more?
>No order, chaotic, no rest for the eye, I personally like this a lot but I understand that not anyone would find this comfortable. 7/10I believe thst this is how most protests are, I definitely didn't want a singular subject, and liked the moody lighting.
>Terrible. 2/10Hah, an anon from anither thread liked it. I found the keys very pretty, what would you differently to capture them? Or do yoy just not like close ups?
