>>4243874But you've never taken a photo where it mattered. There's more than one way to zoom in on an orb. You've done nothing but try and fail to different degrees to prove some "theory". Yes, we already know that a 25mp crop sensor with a small lens takes almost as detailed, slightly lower quality photos compared to a 25mp full frame sensor with a big lens. Good photo when? Does your camera even work anymore?
>>4243875Is anything truly random and lacking creative intent? A photograph taken by accident?
Does it matter? Can't anyone make up a creative process after the fact? Can't anyone come clean and say "it was an accident"? What really matters? Spoilers: Is it good, or is it not.
>le art!And your photos? Where are they?
