>>2975045>No proper flash systemef x-500
>No full frame option or upgrade pathwhat about medium format?
>Poor AF performancex-t2 on par with d500 in terms of AF
>Doesn't work correctly with any of the leading software (adobe, phaseone, dxo)the only fuckup here is adobe
>No pro zoomsXF 50-140 f2.8???
>all lenses only cover crop image circle, so have no futureheres a future proof lens in pic related on the left.
>no third party suppliers of lenses or flashessamyang, zeiss touit + adaptors for all other, nissin, metz
>oem lenses are overpriced and underperformlol
>can't go lower than iso 200, iso is not rated the same as it is for every other mfgwhat exactly is the problem here that would not make you take a nice noiseless picture?
>No resale value (x pro 1's going for under $300 already)x-pro1 is 5 year old now.
>no ergonomicsliterally perfect weight balance, button layout, menus, customization. if you got mammoth hands you can add in an extra grip too.
>no ibisnope. Just like nikon and canon.
>no good battery options except for the xt 1 and 2so there are then?
>no proper tele lensesXF 100-400???? 90mm??? 55-200????
>nothing wider than 16mm equivalenta 7mm undistorted crop does not exist no matter who is the manufacturer
>>2975053the only ones salty are the incompetent gearfags coming to this thread to whine
