>>4235296Oh weird, it's actually not that sharp full res. I'd give it a much heavier sharpening pass. Unsharp mask, like .3-.7 radius, 200-300%.
>>4235303Yeah this one, blurriness aside, is much better. Strong geometries, leading lines, elimination of distracting elements. The subject is clearer: "overwhelmingly large skyscrapers, bisected by edifice floodlights."
