>>4161970>Good enough, I guess, not familiar with modern models.Are you an idiot? Spectrophotometers are best color measurement devices we have.
>Post Dmin against a daylight balanced source of light plsI will post some LF slides here in a sec.
>Uh-huh, you'll pass the grain visibility threshold, with grain being slightly above not visible, on a 20x30 print, IF you'll look at it from 36cm (google how print graininess index is calculated)Yeah, disagree with kodak about the perception of grain. Its not like their pioneers in the field or anything..
>And again, grain is not pixels or noise, so it's not like on digital, when the moment you start seeing pixels-it's the limit of resolutionNever said grain was pixels. It is certainly noise though. If you can see the grain in the scan, that' s as much as you're gonna get out of the film. Any increase in resolution will only make the grain less pixelated, which might be nice if you're gonna print a high iso 35mm shot large, but the fine details are much larger than the grain. You'd know this if you've ever printed in the darkroom(you haven't)'; you use a grain focuser to focus make the grain sharp.
Here is rescan that I just with my s1r, copy stand, nikkor 105mm macro lens and extension tube at f/8, and high cri video light. I aligned the camera and copy stand with a mirror and used tethered shooting to avoid camera shake.
