>>3868682>8-12 f2.8That's a 12-20mm f/4.2 equivalent.
>50 f1That's a 75 f/1.5 equivalent
>90 f2135 f/3 equivalent
>50-140 f/2.875-210 f/4.2 equivalent
>200 f2400 f/3 equivalent
Literally nothing special.
>pro bodiesGFX maybe
>robust framekek, I haven't seen any Nikons or Canons, let alone Pentaxes getting ripped by a strap
>excellent ergonomicsOh you're a joker alright.
>physical control (both decicaded exposure dials and classic two command dials).Pointless and regressive.
I get it, you like your toys which you use to pretend you have a Leica. That's fine. But don't go and try to misrepresent things.
