>>3150161Thanks
>>3150262True. I noticed that on a technical level alone, they look less shit when every frame is scanned individually. For the ones above, I scanned the whole strip of 6 negatives and cropped out the 3:2 frame from that. The one now is a single scan.
>>3150301Don't know, guess it's /fa/ now here, but I hope I'm wrong.
>>3150323Thanks. I sometimes watch his videos and to me, some of his shots aren't bad at all. Still, the idea was more like "shoot many, get some ok ones". Probably not the best idea to do that with film, but I enjoy developing - it's relaxing to me.
