>>4350013yeah, i think i had exposure set to 1.6 or 1.8 in vuescan for that particular pic. unless a histogram is very clearly awful (ie. a giant spike in one spot with no wider curve) i just sorta go on. it's always a bit of a mess trying to get vuescan to lock exposure properly, and the scans i get are good enough for posting online so i don't pay much mind to it.