>>4228941>its the MOOOOUNTNo, it's called ISO cheating and cooking your raws. Everyone does it to some degree, because they don't want to hear from every reviewer in this shrinking pixel peeper focused industry "without editing so and so had less noise"
They simply edit without the reviewers knowledge.
For M43 and APSC this is extremely prudent.
>>4228943What is mislabeling ISO
What is noise reduction
That is all that happens when cameras are doing way better on retard bill's retarded chart, because he is too stupid and lazy to measure ISO rather than just state the cameras setting, and too stupid and lazy to suss out modern NR techniques (which are, as we stand, trade secrets).
I am not saying no one else reduces noise in camera
Sony's bionz XR AI bullshit processors also do this.
But no one is doing it to the extent of olympus, panasonic, and sigma because these companies almost exclusively market to the kind of midwit geeks that look at these charts and say "lets compare the raws" (they are TOO FUCKING STUPID to understand why that can not prove anything - if it's not open source software+hardware, the raw is NOT raw).
You do not know shit
>>4228944Were I arab I would tell you my people invented algebra and chemistry before your people could write and you would seethe
