>>2851329I do like your edit a bit more. Thanks for the nudge in the right direction.
>>2851325It's a series of portraits revolving around a popular park in my city. It's not groundbreaking but I love the park and I'd like to maybe have it displayed in the city hall gallery.
>>2851330t b h the bokeh is more a product of the scan than anything else. This is from an RZ67 with the Z 90 3.5. When printed the bokeh is very smooth, but my scanner seems to read the negative a little more harshly.
I'm switching to the 110 2.8 this week, so hopefully that won't be a problem anymore.
>>2851331That's most likely what I'll do when I print this. The image on the contact actually looks way closer to anon's edit, the print should be similar as well. I'm honestly more skilled at enlargements than scanning, so I'm still fine tuning my editing technique.
Have one more, if you like. Don't complain about reposts come thread time tho.
