>>3558863This is 1/4 ISO 1250. If you took the same shot with an f/1.8 lens at 1/8 you'd need to use ISO 3600. If you also want it to be brighter, like the previous image, then you're going into ISO 5000-ish territory. Now ISO 5000 on a mft sensor might still look better than this image (maybe not, honestly not sure), but it's almost certainly won't look as clean as
>>3558863