>>3909515It's your incompetence at understanding how web sites scale elements to a high dpi screen.
>extended ISOThis just means the manufacturer didn't want normies to use it and bitch about noise. If you would like I could screenshot mft at 3200 vs. FF at 12800. I'll use an HD system so you can't cope.
>>3909521>It's not only that, he's viewing all his images 200% scaled with smoothing upscaling algorithm turned on. No I am not. When you stop being a poor fag and can afford a 4k screen, you will understand.
That's just plain incompetence at this point.
>Here is a proper sample scaled at 400%. Source >>3909493>All the noise grains are where they are on 1:1 version. Compare that to whatever shit his screen is throwing out: You chose the wrong camera. Pic related. Olympus seems to be going backwards in high ISO performance.
