>>4280793We already saw basically all of /fag/s baby butt soft landscapes, and vogue is notorious for aggressive detail smoothing to make their 40y/o child rape victims look better anyways. No idea why people look up to fashion photography. It's just product photography but with prostitutes and clothing.
Doesn't vogue print everything under 8x10 anyways? That's 6mp.
>>4280807Xtrans is from before 2017 so dont even waste your time using it, amirite?
Xtrans has actually gotten worse since then. Now it has 2x2 blocks and rows without any green pixels. If xtrans is so good why isn't it on gfx?
>processing!?Nope, my phone has a better processor than literally every camera. Guess agian.
