>>3556448>Fuji X is 63% larger. This was addressed earlier.Incorrect, we already established and you admitted that MFT was only 38.65% smaller than APS-C.
>APS-C has roughly 1 stop better high ISO. This was addressed earlier."roughly" meaning less than 1 stop, which we've already addressed is an imperceptible difference, for which you won't ever post any real world examples of, not because you don't want to, but because you literally CAN'T.
>The Fuji X-T3 is arguably the best hybrid video camera out right now.The XT3 is essentially useless for professional video with native lenses. For one, the AF speed of Fuji lenses make professional quality video impossible, and, unless you use external audio rigging at least two feet away from the camera, Fuji AF motors are too loud to be used for recording AV together.
Arguably that makes the fucking worst hybrid video camera unless you just like making home movies.
>X-T3 AF is dramatically improved and on par with the competition.This is objectively false and anyone who's EVER tested the XT2 vs. Olympus or Sony know that Fuji AF is a fucking joke.
>No idea what you're talking about, Fuji weather sealing is decent.It isn't. It's not even covered under warranty. They claim and I quote "a certain level of resistance against water splash and dust" but absolutely no details on how much and no demonstrations whatsoever. It's basically just a gimmick. If not, go ahead and spray your WR lenses and Xt3 with a hose and see what happens! I'd love to see it!
>Not a big deal because Fuji's lens lineup is solid.Never said it wasn't solid. They've got pretty much all their bases covered. They're also vastly overpriced and generally no smaller then FF glass. Also, slow, noisy, obsolete AF motors.
>My friend shoots Fuji and none of his lenses are slow/loud.Well my friend owns a Ferrari and none of his 0-60 times are over 8 seconds.
>LOL Fuji lenses are aps-c optimized and quite compact.No, they fucking aren't. lol
