>>3686798nice
>>3686805would have worked better if you fit the whole building in the shot, the missing roof is awkward
>>3686806i like the composition you were going for but the roof on the bottom throws me
>>3686811seems like you executed it well enough. What is there to critique with astrophotog beyond technical aspects?
>>3686855I could see this image having a commercial use but for me it's too contrasty
>>3686873nice tones but could have made the image more compelling with a different composition imo!