>>3554483Jesus Christ the absolute state of Sony owners. There isn't a single lens in the entire Olympus line up that looks as absolutely dogshit tier as this nearly $2000 lens. The 45mm f1.8 that costs $230 is sharper and controls chromabs far, far better than this fucking garbage. I never even knew Sony was this level of trash.
>>3554486Even this isn't impressive. There is still green fringe on the handlegrip and even the in-focus areas are soft. Another thing that immediately leaps out at me is that there is about as much noise noticeable in the bokeh areas as I see at 400 ISO on my EM1 Mk. II, pic related.
I have used ZERO luminescence noise reduction in that example, and 9 on the choma noise. I included the bit of towel in the shot so it can be seen there's no NR, all the detail is in tact, though it is obviously slightly out of focus since the focus was on the subjects eye who is holding it.
Seriously WTF... Are Sony shooters just literally the dumbest fucking retards in all of photography? Is this why our resident Sony shill REFUSES to ever post pictures taken from Sony cameras with Sony lenses and relies on meaningless charts and graphs from the dubious DxO Mark and the unscientific results of the DPReview test scene?
Absolutely fucking hilarious. I'm in awe at how fucking horrible those incredibly expensive lenses look. Holy. Fuck.
