>>3461610EXIF's not showing, but I guess something like f5 1/100? Very nicely set, anon.
The focus is sharp, the colours are nice; you've got all the technicalities nailed down.
Gotta work a bit more on the composition now. For example, it seems like you didn't think much about the role the background would play into the picture, and while the subject is properly portrayed, nothing of interest is really happening.
>>3461602No idea what the difference is, but should have shot at a way faster speed.
>>3461585Very nice. Is there any chance you could get the same picture from a couple floors higher?