>>4251640>Canon has a desolate lens mount Canon has far more FF lenses at this point in RF than Sony had at the same point in E, including numerous lenses Sony does not have, and they natively support all of EF. For fuck's sake Sony JUST GOT a 300 f/2.8. "I've waited 10 years for this lens" LMFAO. Mind you Canon has already moved beyond the 300 f/2.8 prime to a 100-300 f/2.8L IS which is just as sharp as any fast primes in that range. When they introduce a 300 prime for RF it will probably be f/2. For anyone on a budget there are multiple EF 300 f/2.8 primes (L, L IS, L IS mark II). Sony just now covered 300mm f/2.8, Canon has had it covered since the 1990s and today there are FOUR Canon choices for that focal length/aperture.
The problem with you brand fags (paid shills?) is that you can NEVER admit when another brand/mount does something well. I have no problem saying that Sony has pushed sensor development and is doing so again with the A9iii. Bravo. If you're in E-mount and you can really benefit from global shutter, there it is. Congrats. I don't need to cope or seethe to say that. But you have to exaggerate and lie about Canon because they live rent free in your head, just like FF lives rent free in m43 shill's heads.
>FORCED noise reduction WRITTEN INTO THE RAWSEveryone is applying NR to RAWs.
>ALL E SHUTTER BURST SHOOTING IS 12 BIT. Same as everyone else. Difference is the A7iv has to drop to 12-bit at 10 fps, the R6ii does it at fucking 40 fps. Oh, and without lossy RAW compression (lol).
>The real FPS of canon cameras, without a drop to 12 bit, is far lower.But also faster than anything else except, perhaps, the A9iii which was just released. Maybe. Need to see the manual to find out at what fps Sony is dropping to 12-bit, applying lossy compression, and eating stars.
>Believe it or not most people DGAF about the specifics of video, >IF MY BRAND ISN'T BEST AT IT, THEN IT DOESN'T EXISTHoly COPE
