>>4031217I like your research and numbers fren. If youre going to go mft, it looks like lumix is the better option than the olympus
>>4031240My comparison is perfectly balanced in the bodies themselves. The A7C is a prosumer camera just the same as the EM1. The EM1 is not a pro level body. The OM1 is pro level and it's in the same league as the A7SIII. The EOS RP would be considered a consumer entry level FF comparable to the EM5, so let's do that then. I dont know why you went for such an expensive standard lens so I changed it. I also bundled both bodies with the kit lenses since that's how you'd actually buy them. Also you are listing the deal of the century sales price right now. Lets stick to rrp.
>EOS RP - ($1299kit 485g)Battery - 250 shots 60mins recording
Zoom - 24-105 f/4-7.1 ($0 695g)
Wide - 16mm f2.8 ($299 165g)
Std - 50mm f1.8 ($199 160g)
Total Cost $1797
Total Weight 1505g
>EM5MKIII - ($1849kit 414g)Battery - 310 shots 60 mins recording (source for 110?)
Zoom - 12-45 f4 ($0 254g)
Wide - 12mm f2 ($500 130g)
Std - 25mm f1.8 ($299 137g)
Total Cost $2648
Total Weight 935g
Now Im really cutting you come slack here because I've just realized I had the 25mm and the 12mm as the sale price on my OP, so even with me letting that mistake fly, you are so over budget and for what? You save 1lb, I'll give you that but at almost $1000 more than the full frame option. How does that make any sense?
>inb4 using a 6D reject binned sensor camera as a comparisonYou dont mention the quality of mine and I wont bring up the size of yours. Deal?
