>>3326053I can't post full size scans without downsizing, but here's a 100% crop next to the full image. The camera doesn't have the sharpest lens. I'll probably scan some more today and can post a frame taken with a sharper camera/lens combo if you want.
>>3326057That looks dank, but to be honest, my current setup works great. I don't see the need for AF as I only need to focus once. Once focus has been dialed in it doesn't need to be touched again for the entire scan session.
