>>2620236But that's simply not what's going on. That's what you *thought* was going on.
Hate to break it to you, fam, but if it's within the shadow/highlight control range of Fujifilm's jpeg engine, it's nowhere near to the point of losing information.
What you take umbrage with is the fact that I have a different aesthetic in mind than you. That's not anything new with this set.
Here's a straight to greyscale conversion of that shot. Notice how it's almost identical to the OP post?
That's because you don't know what you're talking about. Just as you don't know how fucking retarded the exposure parameters of the image you just posted are.
